Skip to content

Rule t.56.11 Adopted: Intentional Weapon Drop During Action Is a Red Card

Share:

by Bryan Wendell

Text on image saying Rule t.56.11

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. — If a fencer intentionally drops their weapon to avoid a touch, that moment now carries a clear consequence. 

Following a June 2025 vote by the USA Fencing Board of Directors, new rule t.56.11 treats an intentional drop during the action (before “Halt!”) as a Group 2 offense — meaning a red card on each occasion. If the opponent had already begun a valid action before “Halt!,” that touch stands. The change took effect Aug. 1, 2025 for USA Fencing domestic events.

The rule, a 2023 FIE addition, now reads as follows:

Official rule text

t.56.11 — A competitor who intentionally drops their weapon during the fencing phrase will be penalized as specified in Articles t.166, t.170. However, a hit scored by the opponent is valid, provided that the action was started before the ‘Halt!’

What this means (in plain English)

If you intentionally drop your weapon while fencing is live (before the referee says “Halt!”), you concede a red card (Group 2), and your opponent’s touch still stands if their action was underway.

Why this change?

This update aligns domestic rules with the international FIE standard and clarifies a situation that previously fell under “interruption of the bout without valid reason.” By placing intentional weapon drops in Group 2, it is consistent with other actions that may deny an opponent a scoring opportunity (see t.55.2, prohibiting a deliberate touch not on the opponent). The goal is simple: maintain fairness and competitive integrity.

What to know for events (effective Aug. 1, 2025)

  • Penalty level: Group 2; red card on each occasion per t.166 and t.170.
  • Opponent’s touch: If the opponent’s action began before “Halt!”, the touch is valid.
  • Referee judgment: Determining intent remains the referee’s best judgment.
  • Flow of the bout: Existing provisions still apply — e.g., the order “Halt!” if a competitor is disarmed (t.23.5) or cannot wield the weapon correctly (t.24). This change does not alter when a phrase is stopped; it clarifies the penalty when a drop is intentional.
  • Accidental drops: If the weapon is accidentally dropped or knocked out by the opponent, t.56.11 does not apply.

FAQs

1) What is the new penalty for dropping a weapon?

If a fencer intentionally drops their weapon during the action (before “Halt!”), it’s a Group 2 offense—a red card on each occasion—under t.166 and t.170.


2) When does this rule take effect?

The rule is effective for USA Fencing domestic competitions on Aug. 1, 2025. (This rule went into effect at FIE events on Jan. 1, 2024.)


3) What happens if the opponent scores a touch while a weapon has been dropped?

If the opponent’s action began before “Halt!”, the touch is valid.


4) Is intent required for this penalty?

Yes. Intent is required. The rule applies only if the drop is intentional.


5) How do referees determine intent?

Referees will use their best judgment, as they do for many aspects of officiating.


6) What penalties are specified in Articles t.166 and t.170?

t.166 states that every offense in Group 2 is penalized by a red card (penalty touch). t.170 provides the penalty chart as a quick reference.


7) Why is this change necessary?

It aligns USA Fencing with the FIE and clarifies a specific scenario. Without this rule, a fencer facing an imminent touch could intentionally drop their weapon to deny an opponent a scoring chance. The clarified penalty removes the incentive to do so.


8) Does this apply if the weapon drops accidentally or is knocked out by the opponent?

No. t.56.11 applies only to intentional drops.


9) Does this change how bouts are stopped?

No. Existing provisions remain — “Halt!” is ordered if a competitor is disarmed (t.23.5) or cannot wield the weapon correctly (t.24). The new rule clarifies the sanction for an intentional drop.


10) Are there changes to how referees enforce the rule?

Referees continue to use judgment to assess intent. The rule provides a clear, consistent penalty domestically that matches the international standard.